![]() ![]() He went on to talk about how happy he was to let go of the character and be out of that relationship, but it still wouldn't leave him. All your friends go, ‘You need to dump this piece of sh-, he or she is destroying your life.’ And then once you’re out of it, you see, ‘I was so miserable.’ But I wouldn’t say I was miserable doing Pennywise because I had a lot of fun with it as well." People don’t really realize it until they’re out of it. He went on to say that living with this monstrous character was like being in an abusive relationship: "It’s just like being in a very destructive relationship. Pennywise and Bill go into this sort of relationship together, and I’m trying to figure out who he is and I have to devote so much time and effort to this other person – or thing, in this case – and that goes on for months." He brought the character to life in the most terrifying of ways and apparently after he was finished playing him, the character continued to haunt him! He couldn't get Pennywise out of his head! In an interview with EW, the actor said: "I liken every character that I do to a relationship that you’re in. This approach, which turns the clown into something akin to Stephen King's version of Freddy Krueger, allows the shapeshifting Curry to voice some of Pennywise’s most memorable lines, but it also defangs the monster’s terrifying potential somewhat as the killer clown effectively acts as a Boggart, taking the form of the kid’s worst fears, scaring them senseless, and then throwing off a one-liner instead of inflicting any physical damage.Bill Skarsgård was amazing in the role of Pennywise The Clown in the big screen adaptation of Stephen King's IT. In numerous infamous scenes, Pennywise terrifies the stars of the series by taking the form of a werewolf, a monster, and numerous classic fears, only to turn back into his clown form and leave them with a quip instead of killing them. Each iteration has its fans, but one fan theory posits that there’s a reason Curry’s creepy clown is so much funnier.Ĭurry’s It stays in character (as it were) by cracking wise even when scaring the kids, but why does the monster choose to act as a genuinely amusing clown when he could be focusing on traumatizing victims? While this element remains one of the most memorable parts of the miniseries, it is genuinely difficult to fathom the reason behind Curry's goofy demeanor while watching the series. In contrast, the movie adaptation’s star Bill Skarsgård (whose brother Alexander recently played another one of King's most famous monsters) opts to instead play the part terrifyingly dead straight. Curry famously plays the character as a campy, surprisingly funny fourth-wall breaker. The creepy clown is a central figure in both versions of the story, as he is the default form of the shapeless titular monster, cropping up in every second scene to scar the story’s stars. However, no matter which version of Stephen King’s bestseller fans prefer, there’s no denying that there is a world of difference between Curry and Skarsgård’s interpretations of Pennywise. Related: Everything The Stand 2020 Should Have Done Differentlyīoth the blockbuster movie version of IT and the earlier miniseries have their ardent defenders, with fans of the films noting the consistently strong performances and impressive production values, while lovers of the miniseries claim the story has more room to breathe in a slower-paced medium. The more recent two-part blockbuster, IT and IT: Chapter Two, was released between 20 and offered a darker take on the novel’s story. The 1990 miniseries famously featured Tim Curry in the title role, and the cult actor’s legendary take on Pennywise the Dancing Clown papered over some corny characterization and inconsistent performances to make IT one of the most beloved of the' 90s miniseries adapted from Stephen King’s work. Despite this, there are not one, but two, adaptations of Stephen King’s It, both of which boast sizeable fanbases. ![]() The unconventional structure of IT, as well as the novel’s occasionally shocking content, meant that many readers considered a faithful adaptation impossible. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |